Inflation, excluding the inflation.

No one will be surprised by the fact that I, along with tens of millions of others, believe that inflation is being underreported by the government; I've written on it countless times in this blog alone, and if we've ever talked economics, then I'm sure the subject came-up. It's probably why this article really caught my attention and I'd recommend it to all of you who would like to know more on the subject.

The long and short of it is a comparison of the US economy with that of a couple dozen other countries - including many of America's trading partners. What's surprising is that US inflation rates have been a relatively consistent 3% to 4% lower than that represented by this benchmark group. Of course, economists would argue that this differential can be explained away as a result of greater productivity in the US, but do we actually believe that the US economy is more productive than India or China, for example? 

Many of you know that there are two commonly-quoted inflation rates: the headline rate and the core rate, or what the author of this reference article calls the inflation, excluding inflation. Guess which one is the official rate? What you quickly notice after glancing at a graph such as the one below is that the difference between the official 'core' rate and the more realistic headline rate is growing - the greater the separation between the two, the more unrealistic are the figures being reported by the government, and more importantly for us investors, the less reliable are the valuations used to compute a stock or bond price!

Anyone who's taken a class in finance understands the importance of the inflation rate in the calculation of the price of any asset; it's absolutely critical as a starting-point including the risk-free rate to determine a real rate of return on investment. Without an accurate measure of inflation, we have no real idea of what our real return is - i.e. what the purchasing power is of our investment upon maturity.

The thing that I like most about this article is that the author doesn't present any of this as a conspiracy theory, but rather as an alarming warning to investors - cautioning us all about keeping this discrepancy in the back of our minds when making our valuation calculations and investment decisions. Now go... read it.

Is the CPI a scam?

The latest consumer price index figures were released yesterday and they showed a less-than-expected rise in the prices the average consumer pays for goods ranging from food to medical expenses. Of course, with the news dominated by the high cost of fuel and food prices continuing to rise, it's difficult to believe that inflation is not still higher than what is being reported. Consequently, I'm not surprised when asked how the CPI could possibly be an accurate reflection of the changes in the prices we really pay.

The reality is that it's probably not too far off from the truth. Sure, there are likely to be some estimation errors that come from the fact that not every single product can be monitored, but - on the whole - the Department of Labour is most likely reporting the figures it actually does record from in the marketplace. So, then, what is the discrepancy? Why is it that it seems as though our prices are rising faster than what our government is telling us?

The answer, unfortunately, is unlikely to satisfy many who are pondering the question. For one, the media isn't helping matters. The fact that we hear so much about commodity prices and the cost of oil on the rise and hitting record levels tends to overwhelm the public consciousness as it relates to prices. 

Furthermore, it's important to remember what the CPI actually represents: the average price paid for a specified bundle of goods by the average consumer in America. Now, ask yourself: are you average? To answer the question, consider the goods that you buy; are they representative of what the average person buys on a regular basis?

Although unsatisfying, the reality is that the CPI does probably represent a relatively accurate estimate of how prices change for the average consumer. Maybe what we should all be complaining about is the fact that there is no price index for the middle class, middle-upper class and so-on. All our concerns over gasoline prices are warranted, but does the average consumer drive an SUV or take the bus? While the 100% rise in the price of rice is undoubtedly troubling for developing nations, the extra $5 a month for the American household is, in all likelihood, going to go unnoticed as a change in the bank account balance.