Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts

Monday, June 2, 2008

Timing Losses & Financial Institutional Strength

Let me tell you a story to prove a point. Assume that you loaned me $1,000 2-years ago (thanks, by the way) and I had not paid you any interest or principal ever since. Assume further that we met today to negotiate a settlement and I offered to pay you $200 as a one-time payment to satisfy the entire amount of the loan. The question: how much money did you lose and when did you lose it?

Those of you who are financial inclined are likely already doing some discounted cash flow calculations, but let's keep things simple; let's ignore the time-value of money. Many of you, then, are likely shouting a loss of $800 today, and I'm sure that many more of you would be tempted to agree, but to see why this is the wrong answer, we need to differentiate between paper-losses (accounting) and actual losses (cash flows).

From an accounting perspective, you, the lender, had created an account to represent the account loan and the expected future repayment. What is important to acknowledge, however, is that the $1,000 that you lent to me flowed out from your bank account 2-years ago - not today. Put differently, you have had $1,000 less funds for 2-years; my offer to repay you only $200 of the full amount does not represent a loss, but rather a positive cash flow today. Actually, it's as simple as:

-$1,000 :: cash flow out to me in the form of a loan
$0 :: cash flows from my repayment of principal and interest
+$200 :: cash flow from my repayment and settlement of the loan today

Now, I'm sure you're asking yourself why this revelation is important. Well, let's consider the banks that are scrambling for credit and new sources of financing in light of the so-called credit crisis spurred by the billions of dollars in write-downs. Ask yourself when those related losses actually occurred. Also, ask yourself whether the settlement of these debts at $0.20 on the dollar leaves more or less cash on the balance sheets of these banks. Notice, that I asked about whether this left more or less cash - I didn't ask about net assets. This is the difference between accounting losses and actual (cash flow) losses.

The interesting conclusion that many of you are now likely making is that the settlement of these bad debts is actually leaving these banks in a stronger, rather than weaker, financial position. So why are they scrambling to borrow from the Federal Reserves auction facilities? Good question. They certainly don't need the cash - their cash positions haven't changed! Only their accounting positions have changed. It is true that this does affect their ability to lend as it leaves them with fewer assets and collateral, but fears over bank failures is certainly unfounded. Now, as an investor watching the markets and seeing the tumbling stock prices of many, if not all, financial institutions, ask yourself if the broader market has misinterpreted the events over the past few months. Lastly, ask yourself the market's overreaction leaves you with an opportunity to profit from the rebound that is unquestionably going to happen - given enough time for the banks to restart their lending engines.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Credit lines in the sand

It's tempting to believe that the credit crisis is nearing an end. I hear it too; many of you know that I'm an avid CNBC watcher and their stance, more often then not, is that the worst is behind us. I'm afraid that I disagree. The worst is yet to come. The reason? The tighter belts at the banks and slowing credit hasn't had enough time to really impact businesses ...yet.

I wrote a post a few days ago quoting an article wherein they stated that bankruptcies were up 49% year-over-year. I'm afraid that even that is only the beginning, but it is an indication of what is yet to come.  Businesses, especially growing businesses, rely on their credit lines to get them through the tough times. We're in one of those times now, but the credit lines won't be there to provide the businesses with the cushions that they need.

In stead, businesses will begin to see their cash reserves dwindle as their sales and revenues decline. Of course, no business, especially new businesses, can react instantly to changing market conditions. As a result, fixed costs will remain at their original levels for some time and those fixed costs will need to be covered - if not by revenues, then by what? The credit lines won't be there... Put one and one together and you begin to see the picture that's developing nationwide.

The credit crises, or at least what started it initially, may be nearing an end. Unfortunately, the effects of that crisis are only now beginning to be felt and it will take time for their full impact to reach the bottom line.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Banks need to shed the fat before the next lending feast can begin

Banks have been working diligently to rid themselves of the lending commitments that  helped to take down Bear Stearns. It's not only the mortgage-backed securities and CDOs that everyone's been talking about. Low-rated, high-risk, debt sitting on the balance sheets of many of the top banks is holding back any new motivation for new lending. It's gotten so bad that banks are willingly taking a loss on these loans just to get themselves clear of the whole mess.

From Citibank to Goldman to Deutsche Bank, no one is exempt. Banks are not only selling off loans with junk ratings at almost half-price, but are offering below-cost financing terms to anyone who will buy them. To put that into perspective, that's like someone selling you their home for less than what it's worth (on paper) and lending you the money to buy it at interest rates lower than what you could get elsewhere. Sure, if someone wants to get rid of something that badly, then it can't be all-good, but rest assured that some of these risk-loving buyers are going to win big when things finally do settle.

Cut your losses. It's a saying that every investor knows (or should know). Banks are well known for their ability to make money in any market and their ability to weather almost anything (obviously with some exceptional exceptions). They do so by knowing when to get out of a bad situation. There's a lesson in there, I'm sure...